Rocking vs Galloping
Rocking vs Galloping
Facebook is known for many things, one of which are the posters plastered on its walls. "Move Fast and Break Things" may capture the headlines at F8 but our favorite is the following:
How does this relate to measurement?
Many teams set up a process of testing that creates a lot of motion but not much progress. A fantastic example of this is what Mobile Dev Memo recently argued about A/B testing creative on Facebook - it just shouldn't be done.
"Split Testing is probably the most expensive way of vetting creatives...Split Testing violates the dynamics of Facebook’s ad serving algorithm; it’s a concept that isn’t appropriate for the platform and does little more than satiate a desire to put a checkmark next to a “Tested?” line item on a process checklist."
Theory vs Practice
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is." - Benjamin Brewster
It is always important that a statistical test models reality (eg, what you're actually doing on a day-to-day basis). The reason A/B testing creative on Facebook "violates the dynamics of Facebook’s ad serving algorithm" is because the test does not model the realities of the Facebook algorithm.
"Facebook initially distributes traffic to the ads equally but recognizes that the audiences for each are different and thus defines new, creative-specific audiences in real time to optimize performance. A more efficient way of testing ad creatives on Facebook than Split Testing is to simply put the creatives in an ad set [and] let Facebook manage traffic distribution to them. And if audiences need to be segmented or geo-fenced, then that can be accomplished with different ad sets — there’s almost no reason to Split Test creatives, since the audience used in a Split Test won’t be the one exposed to any given creative at scale."
Let's Go Galloping
How many agencies have you heard discuss their creative split testing framework? How many meetings have you sat in which showcased their latest round of creative split testing? Our guess is at least several as this type of work is consistent in advertising. Teams believe that all motion is progress while in reality it can be wasted effort and wasted client money.
Why put resources against setting up and analyzing an A/B test that doesn’t model real world conditions? A/B testing is an important statistical tool; however, it needs to be leveraged in situations in which testing conditions model real-life conditions. Ads in a newspaper fit this condition. Ads in a news feed do not.
When you can match test conditions to real-life, measurement agendas begin to trot. And when the C-suite can all explain what occurred in the study, that is when it gallops. (More on how measurement is actually a persuasion problem wrapped up as an analysis problem at a later date.)
If you feel your team or agency learning agenda is creating a lot of motion but not much progress, chances are you're right. Don't fret! The best time to make a change was last year, the second best time is today.
And for the sake of all those involved (including your checkbook), stop using the split testing tool to vet creatives on Facebook!
--
After running 257 lift studies across 30+ different clients in our past, we thought it would be helpful to write a series on common mistakes and how to avoid them. This write up is part 5 in the series we call Adventures in Significance
This is a dreaded subject by many but is core to the direct response advertising world. We thought we could do our part with a round-up of our favorite opinions on the subject and how this applies to your business.
--
Thanks to Helena Lopes for sharing their work on Unsplash.
Read next
Facebook Ads Bidding Strategies can either make or break your advertising campaign. If you've been struggling with getting the best results, understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each strategy can save you both time and money. The right bidding strategy can help you reach your target audience more effectively and get the most out of your advertising budget.
Each bidding strategy has its unique benefits and challenges. Some are great for maximizing visibility, while others prioritize cost-efficiency. Choosing the right one depends on your specific goals, whether that's more clicks, better engagement, or higher sales. Knowing the pros and cons of each strategy will help you make informed choices that benefit your business.
This article will guide you through five key Facebook Ads Bidding Strategies. You’ll learn about their benefits, drawbacks, and how to pick the one that suits your campaign objectives. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which strategy will help you achieve your advertising goals effectively.
Understanding Facebook Bidding Mechanics
Facebook bidding is essential for advertising success. It involves auctions where advertisers compete for ad placements. Understanding key elements like Auction Dynamics and Different Bidding Strategies is crucial.
Auction Dynamics and How Bids Work
In Facebook's auction, ads compete based on bids, estimated action rates, and ad quality. Bid represents how much you're willing to pay for a specific action (like clicks, views, or conversions). The Cost Per Result adjusts based on competition.
Bid Cap lets advertisers set a maximum bid. This ensures spending control but may limit campaign reach. Meta bidding strategies, like Lowest Cost and Target Cost, help optimize for specific goals, balancing cost and performance.
Factors influencing the auction include:
- Bid amount
- Ad relevance
- Estimated action rates
Exploring Different Bidding Strategies
Advertisers can choose from several Facebook bidding strategies. The Lowest Cost strategy aims to get the most results for the lowest price but may lack spending control. The Cost Cap strategy helps maintain an average cost while driving results.
The Bid Cap strategy is useful for high-control needs, letting you set the max bid per action but it might restrict delivery. Target Cost aims for a stable cost per action, ideal for steady budget planning.
Choosing the right strategy depends on your campaign goals, budget, and desired Cost Per Result. Evaluate each option to find the best fit for your needs.
Implementing Bidding Strategies for Campaign Success
Successful implementation of bidding strategies can drive better results and optimize ad spend. Key factors include setting appropriate bid caps, maximizing returns using ROAS goals, and balancing volume and value.
Setting the Right Bid Cap for Your Campaign
Setting the right bid cap involves determining the maximum amount you are willing to pay for a result. This ensures costs don't exceed the budget. Bid caps can help control spending and improve efficiency.
- Analyze past performance: Review historical data to identify the highest bid that achieved desired results.
- Adjust as needed: Be flexible to change bid caps based on real-time campaign performance.
- Consider the competition: Higher bid caps might be necessary in competitive markets.
Maximizing Returns with ROAS Goals
Use the Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) bid strategy to drive maximum returns. ROAS goals ensure that every dollar spent on ads generates a specific amount of revenue.
- Calculate target ROAS: Set a realistic ROAS based on past campaigns.
- Monitor and tweak: Regularly check ad performance and adjust your ROAS goals to meet revenue targets.
- Balance quality and cost: High ROAS might limit reach, so find a balance between cost and quality.
Balancing Volume and Value in Bidding
Balancing volume and value helps achieve the right mix of reach and profitability. Consider using both Highest Volume and Highest Value strategies.
- Highest Volume: Bids are set to get the most conversions, good for awareness and large-scale campaigns.
- Highest Value: Focuses on getting the highest-value conversions, suitable for targeting high-value customers.
By carefully implementing these strategies, advertisers can meet their campaign goals effectively.
5 Facebook Bidding Strategies: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Selection Guide
Static ads and dynamic ads serve different purposes in the world of marketing. Static ads are simple and stay the same at all times. They are easy to create and can be effective for straightforward messaging. But dynamic ads offer customization, changing their content to fit the audience's preferences and behaviors.
Dynamic ads might seem complicated, but they bring better results by targeting specific groups with personalized messages. This means higher engagement rates and more conversions. Static ads, on the other hand, are less effort to produce but may not capture attention as effectively.
Deciding between static and dynamic ads depends on the brand's goals and resources. Each has its strengths and can be powerful if used appropriately in a marketing strategy.
Understanding Static and Dynamic Ads
Static ads and dynamic ads serve different purposes in digital marketing. Each has unique features and benefits that cater to varied marketing needs.
Exploring Static Image Ads
Static image ads are straightforward. They are typically still images that do not change once created. These ads are ideal for conveying a clear, unchanging message or brand image.
A static image can include text, graphics, and logos, and is often used on websites and social media platforms.
Advantages of Static Images
- Consistency: The message remains the same, which can be useful for brand recognition.
- Simplicity: They are simple to create and often cost less than dynamic ads.
- Predictability: Once the ad goes live, what you see is what you get.
Unpacking Dynamic Advertising
Dynamic ads are more complex. They can change content in real-time based on user data and behavior. Unlike static ads, dynamic ads can alter images, text, and calls to action depending on who is viewing the ad.
Benefits of Dynamic Ads
- Personalization: Content can be tailored to each user, potentially increasing engagement.
- Flexibility: They can show different messages to different audiences without creating multiple ads.
- Efficiency: They adapt to user preferences, making the ad experience more relevant.
Comparative Analysis and Use Cases
Static and dynamic ads offer different benefits and limitations. This comparison will help you understand where and how to use each type effectively in your marketing strategy.
Static Images Vs. Videos
Static images are simple and quick to create. They load faster than videos, which is great for mobile users and slow internet connections. They allow for clear, focused messages without distractions.
Videos, on the other hand, capture attention better with motion and sound. They convey more information in a short time. Videos are more engaging and can demonstrate products or services in action.
Leveraging Opportunities for Static Ads
Static ads are useful in various scenarios. Billboards are a great example, as they need to be read quickly. Print ads in magazines and newspapers also benefit from static images. Online banners are often more effective when static, as they load quickly and are less intrusive.
Static ads are best when the message is straightforward. They work well for short calls to action like "Buy Now" or "Sign Up." Visually, they should be clean and uncluttered to convey the message quickly.
